Does Pleurisy Spread To Other Areas

"The last of the rule of law?




I present the situation:

- The PP has constitutional challenges to the Statute of Catalonia.

- By the number of conservative and progressive judges (very interesting this that judges are politicized as root) would vote tie, tiebreak President, progressive.

- Pérez Tremps, Judge Progressive, is challenged by their peers at the request of the PP. So the Conservatives win the vote and the statute could be declared unconstitutional.

- If Perez resigns Tremps may appoint another Judge Progressive and again be voting against the resources. The PP says that " Government will not dare to force the resignation of Trains ".


Is this what the fuck is it? What country, a democratic, can give a situation in which:

- a people, in this case Catalan freely choose their representatives.
- 90% of the representative who has chosen the people are in favor of a law, in this case a Statute of Autonomy. This statute was approved.
- representatives of the remaining 10% claim that the ICC Statute not approved by hook or by crook. They use the courts for a political decision.
- when the courts seems to prove them right, get involved in the legal process to challenge to a judge, and get it!, and are thrown up his hands to his head if the judge resigns.

...?

Which?