Fire Red For Vba Emulator

legal ideas, ideas illegal




Writer Simon

can be reduced to two ideas that exist in Euskadi, though much reduced and I am speaking only of what each one wants to be Euskadi.

The idea that there is a right of self-determination and of itself be recognized.

Everyone is free to have the idea you want, everything is very nice ... no freedom of thought ... anyone put in jail for having ideas that are ... they say.

The fact is that at the end of this whole democratic free thinking should be clear that there is only one idea that can be carried out because the other is illegal, is prohibited ... does not matter any more or less than what your idea is the recognition self-determination, always get their way that your idea is non-recognition, play it safe ... with marked cards, play with the security that the ban against his idea, they can say they are more if you want to say because it is also forbidden to hold referendums to see how many of each idea.

If someone who is self-determination by the rebels against this ... those of non-self can safely say that they feel attacked in their ideas and turn over the tables reminding everyone is free to think whatever they want and to respect his thinking ... he is good because it respects the idea of Yes self-determination ... the other is wrong because they are angry with her idea of \u200b\u200bnot self-determination.

First: Do not upset the idea of \u200b\u200bself-determination but not the ban on the opposite idea.

Second fucks Nooooo! not going to respect that everyone has the idea of \u200b\u200bthe autoderminación Yes when you play with the security that is prohibited and you're 2 or 200 .... always carry out your idea and never the opposite. Children

miosss ... think a bit about all this before you start talking about democracy, respect for ideas, freedom ...
aaaaamen

Does Pleurisy Spread To Other Areas

"The last of the rule of law?




I present the situation:

- The PP has constitutional challenges to the Statute of Catalonia.

- By the number of conservative and progressive judges (very interesting this that judges are politicized as root) would vote tie, tiebreak President, progressive.

- Pérez Tremps, Judge Progressive, is challenged by their peers at the request of the PP. So the Conservatives win the vote and the statute could be declared unconstitutional.

- If Perez resigns Tremps may appoint another Judge Progressive and again be voting against the resources. The PP says that " Government will not dare to force the resignation of Trains ".


Is this what the fuck is it? What country, a democratic, can give a situation in which:

- a people, in this case Catalan freely choose their representatives.
- 90% of the representative who has chosen the people are in favor of a law, in this case a Statute of Autonomy. This statute was approved.
- representatives of the remaining 10% claim that the ICC Statute not approved by hook or by crook. They use the courts for a political decision.
- when the courts seems to prove them right, get involved in the legal process to challenge to a judge, and get it!, and are thrown up his hands to his head if the judge resigns.

...?

Which?

Level Packs For Cube Runner

have to give peace a chance



We return to the charge in Buffet Libre. Is that the guests you walk out there but do not let your recipes animais, I expect more participation, do not be vaguetes or vaguetas.

Al plate.

Today I bring an issue in recent polls of the CIS has uploaded some steps on the levels of concern of the citizens of the English State. Terrorism. In particular terror ETA exerted on the Basque people and other English towns.

As you know the March 23, 2006 ETA declared a "permanent ceasefire" to boost the output of the Basque conflict through dialogue. From then until now there have been many events that have complicated the peace process, the mediated solution by both the English State, as part of ETA and by the nationalist world.

The December 30th happening than anyone expected, a new criminal action of ETA, 200 kilos of explosive collapse of the T4 zone and carried with it two people. Two immigrants ecuatarianos. The Government assumes broken the peace process. Batasuna says the process is not broken. The different mechanisms government begin to take steps through the court against the world pdoer nationalist and ETA prisoners. In Parliament, all parties agree PP least a new consensus against ETA.

With all this cocktail of condiments, what menu we prepare to reach the end of violence?

I have it very clear. Give him a chance for peace in Euskadi. The only option is dialogue, the recent history of the peoples who have been in a situation similar to Euskadi should teach us the way: Northern Ireland and Montenegro should teach. No dialog will never be peace. Even with the dirty war against ETA in the 80 exemplified by the GAL, nor anti-democratic laws of the PP, nor with the recent prosecution orchestrated by the Government is over and end the violence. Euskadi because there is a problem of violence by violence, but a problem of determining an issue of ideas. And ideas or are killed or are imprisoned. Outlaw

matches outlaw youth organizations, increasing penalties, ETA prisoners away from their homes, criminalizing the dialogue between politicians is not the road.

sniping necks, flying cars, business sabotage, threats and restricting to politics is not the road.

Sitting at a table, put everyone's ideas on a platter, and keep the best choice for SI Basque people is the solution. And in this dialogue, how they should reach agreement?

I have it very clear. Just enforce the law. First of all, the return of Basque prisoners. Only 40 ETA prisoners are in jails Basque. And be jailed close to home is usually a right that recognize the laws of this State. Second, one need only observe dozens of UN resolutions which recognize the right of self-determination of peoples, that is, given the option to the Basque people want to choose that path.

and everything else, is to continue as it began 50 years ago. I repeat: we must give peace a chance.